Fantasy Stories

Full Version: Make Full Utilization Of Your Articles Reference Box
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Today, there is certainly not anything wrong with this, I only think that writers who are doing this are missing out on possible traffic and/or consumers. Such reference boxes is only going to gain their site ratings in a...

I run a report service on my site, and I'm seeing an ever-increasing amount of articles being presented, only for the backlink provided in the Resource Box. If people desire to discover extra information on American Brewers Guild [TEST] | DinaBoulto, we know of tons of databases you might pursue. This might be because of the increasing number of PLR articles and material that is becoming available.

Today, there is certainly not something wrong with this, I just believe that authors who are doing this are missing out on potential traffic and/or customers. If you have an opinion about video, you will probably hate to compare about linklicious.com. Such reference boxes will only gain their site ratings in incoming links that are valued by any search engine.

Is this a bad thing? No. Where they are losing out is as follows.

Much of the traffic to my post index comes from search engines, by people trying to find information on a specific topic. Today, this user types within their key-words, clicks o-n the search field, and is given a listing of relevant sites. They chose one, and are taken up to the author's article. They browse the article about, say, snowboarding, think 'This is interesting' and go to the author's reference box at the conclusion of the article to see what else they've to say on this issue. There, they locate a link to your site advertising cellular ringers. Is the reader planning to be impressed, or interested in this? Not very likely. They want to learn about snowboarding, not modify their phone. I really believe one of three things may happen then:

The reader leaves the entire site in disgust.

The reader clicks on a link to a relevant report.

The reader clicks on a related Google AdSense (or similar contextual marketing) offer.

They do not click the author's resource link. That's a potential consumer dropped, quite probably permanently.

Yes, put a link in to your site in the reference box, but most article websites let many links, so for goodness sake put a link in that' ;s associated with the article subject also, and preferably put it in first, before you lose the customer.

'But my site does not have such a thing to do with that matter onto it'!

You can add something which does. Increase a report index, and have the source package saying 'To learn more articles on this issue, click the link.' Add a web directory, and have the writing say 'To look at links to websites with this issue, click here.' Or simply head to Click-bank, try to find related jobs, and have a link to them, using the link saying something similar to 'If you prefer to learn more on this issue, buy this product.' Preferably, not just a direct connect to the merchandise, but a cloaked or redirected one.

Using this method, you still get that connect to your site that you were after originally, but, additionally, you've the chance to generate income from the reader in a brand new way. A situation. Plus, you don't appear to be someone only submitting purchased content on any subject just for the sake of the backlink it will give you. A much more professional look. Is not it worth taking the time to make better use of one's reference field?. Dig up new information on this affiliated use with - Click here: what is linklicious.
Reference URL's